driftpilot

Verified

May 5, 2026

Solid improvement! Coverage area is decent and the bridges and night lighting especially are better than default

aniiran

Verified

Apr 30, 2026

Pretty Good, but a few bad buildings and omissions have brought the score down for me. I could see some issues in the screen shots, but I wanted to see hat it really looked like. The good: Willamette River bridges are all there and nice ly done from selwood to St Johns and the 1-5 Columbia River bridges are done. The scenery is not the highest quality but better than stock photo grammetry. But the modeling and texturing are sub par to me. Many of the buildings dont look like they do in real life, textures don't look like the real thing and some building just have like a blanket material they dont have in real life. Block 216 Tower is not oriented properly but i just looked at Google Maps and it shows it there, so not sure why its in the wrong orientation. it's also too big. Block 216 is only the 5th tallest building in Portland and should be 40 feet shorter than Park Avenue West. Park Avenue west. 11 and 12 west look totally wrong, and like they were just modeled quickly. The Moda Center was modeled but the convention center and all the Lloyd district towers are stock photgrammetry. Yard tower is missing There a quite a few landmarks missing and I feel like what makes a scenery really worth it are those little touches. Maybe the Portland OLD TOWN sign. A modeled version of the tramway on the south water front. Port cranes on the willamette and both sides of the columbia as these are really notible on approach to PDX from the east. Solid effort but, just a few too many thing to overlook. It's better than RK Bridger + Phtogrammetry if you really need downtown portland. But inaccurate modeling, stange textures, missing items bring it down from a 4. 5 would have needed a lot more work on texturing modeling and landmarks modeled. I was expecting more for 10 dollars.